Key Takeaways
- Scope Creep: AI lowers the barrier to entry for new tasks. As a result, job descriptions expand quietly but significantly.
- Blurred Boundaries: "Just one more prompt" often bleeds into lunch breaks and evenings. Because it feels easy, we don't realize we're still "on."
- Cognitive Load: Managing multiple AI threads simultaneously creates a cycle of constant context-switching, leading to hidden mental fatigue.
The uncomfortable truth: AI doesn’t just accelerate tasks; it accelerates expectations.
A recent eight-month field study by Harvard Business Review at a 200-person tech firm revealed a startling trend. As employees adopted Generative AI, they didn't do less; they did more. They broadened their scope and extended their hours—often voluntarily.
This is the efficiency trap. Initially, it feels empowering: no more blockers, instant feedback, and rapid progress. But eventually, the "hidden bill" arrives in the form of increased coordination overhead and the relentless rhythm of always having an AI agent or workflow running in the background.
👉 The biggest risk isn’t a lack of AI adoption; it’s unmanaged AI acceleration. Sustainable productivity requires an intentional AI Practice. This means setting explicit norms for when to use the tools, and more importantly, when to turn them off. Leaders must focus on creating environments that enrich roles rather than placing employees on an endless digital treadmill.
If your team is "more productive" but more exhausted than ever, the solution isn't more upskilling. It’s time to redesign the operating system.
#AI #GenerativeAI #FutureOfWork #AIProductivity #WorkDesign #Leadership #ChangeManagement
🔍 Does AI actually save time or does it just make work "faster"?